SF CHRP (San Francisco Committee for Human Rights in the Philippines) is a San Francisco based human rights advocacy group. Latest news and views on human rights in the Philippines.
In an article for InterAksyon journalist Rupert Francis D. Mangilit writes about the legacy of human rights advocate and lawyer Romeo Capulong:
This, said Karapatan chairperson Marie Hilao-Enriquez, was how they would call Romeo Capulong because not only would he offer free legal service to victims of human rights violations, he would often also spend his own money to help them.
Friday evening, human rights lawyers and advocates from the Philippines and other countries gathered in Quezon City for the 1st Romeo T. Capulong Lecture Series in honor of the quintessential “people’s lawyer,” who died September last year at the age of 77.
When Capulong returned to the Philippines in 1986 after spending seven years in exile in the United States, what he really wanted to do was advance consumer rights, recalled Dr. Edelina dela Paz, who heads the Health Alliance for Democracy, who sought his legal advise as she did the groundwork for what would become the Council for Primary Health Care.
But the period after the country peacefully booted out the dictator Ferdinand Marcos also saw an alarming escalation in human rights violations, among these the brazen killing of known political activists like labor leader Rolando Olalia.
From then on, Capulong provided free legal assistance in case after case of human rights violations, telling his colleagues this was his passion.
He went on to found the Public Interest Law Center in 1989 and the National Union of People’s Lawyers in 2007, in effect helping birth a new generation of lawyers who, like him, found their calling in defending victims of injustice.
He also became legal consultant of the National Democratic Front peace negotiating panel.
In a clip from one of Capulong’s last interviews, which was shown during the lecture series, he explained why he was so committed to what he did: “Naniniwala ako sa pinaglalaban namin ng kliyente ko (I believe in what I and my clients fight for).”
One time, he said, “nag-away kami nu’ng judge. Binato ako ng folder. Kasi ‘yung moral outrage mo, ‘yung righteous indignation, lilitaw ‘yun. Minsan, ‘di mo ma-control (I and the judge fought. He hurled a folder at me. Because your moral outrage, your righteous indignation, will surface. Sometimes, you just can’t control it).”
“Gusto mong labanan ang masama (You want to fight evil). Just to keep you going,” he added.
Karapatan’s Enriquez, who also chairs SELDA, an organization of former political detainees instrumental in filing a class suit against the late Ferdinand Marcos for the atrocities committed during his dictatorship, said it was Capulong who taught her the importance of engaging media in exposing human rights violations.
“I will never forget our meetings at 6 in the morning,” Enriquez recalled, the memory bringing tears to her eyes. “He would discuss with me how to talk to the media about our case, what Marcos did to us. And although he was already sick, he would join me … in explaining (to the other Marcos victims] what is happening in the case.”
But for those he mentored, Capulong’s true legacy is how he encouraged and led them by example to become public interest lawyers.
PILC managing counsel Rachel Pastores recalled how Capulong liked to pose challenges on how to use the law to bring about social change, particularly how to get more lawyers interested in public interest work when the poverty incidence is high and human rights violations are rampant.
She quoted from one of Capulong’s last speeches, in which he explained what set “people’s lawyers” apart: “People’s lawyers … involve themselves in causes, cases and issues that fundamentally affect the lives of a large number of people, usually a sector of society or even the whole society itself.”
Another challenge was dealing with the vilification of lawyers engaged in human rights work, who not only ended up being branded “rebel sympathizers” and “enemies of the state” but also found themselves targeted for actual repression or worse.
NUPL secretary general Edre Olalia pointed to the recent branding of their organization and Karapatan as “enemies” by Philippine Army chief Lieutenant General Noel Coballes after they had criticized the promotion of Brigadier General Aurelio Balalad, one of the officers charged for allegedly torturing and illegal detaining 43 health workers accused of being communist rebels.
“But we actually do not mind,” Olalia said of the label, if it means they are enemies of those who violate human rights.